Before adopting any resource, run it through this audit. The goal is to prevent “care” from becoming surveillance,
coercion, or institutional dependency.
1) Governance
Who controls the program, edits the materials, and sets priorities? Is community/peer governance structurally real (not symbolic)?
2) Data & Surveillance
What data is collected? Who receives it? Can work be done with minimal or local-only records?
3) Coercion & Consent
What happens in crisis? Are police, forced treatment, or involuntary confinement defaults—or are voluntary peer options built in?
4) Economic Dependencies
Can the model survive grant collapse? Does it require professional pipelines, licensing, or permanent external funding?
5) Cosmology & Culture
Does it preserve local meaning systems (spiritual/cultural frames) or overwrite them with clinical universalism?
6) Interface Risk
If scaled, does it naturally integrate into digital ID, insurance, algorithmic triage—or can it remain locally sovereign?
7) Forkability & Antifragility
Can small groups adapt and remix it safely? Are failures local and reversible, or systemic and cascading?
8) Narrative & Subject Position
Are people framed as patients/beneficiaries—or as agents, peers, organizers, survivors, and co-authors of the system?